15 Comments

Hi Michael,

Thanks for sharing your experiment. Nice to see the craters and the Pretzel. Of course Fe in the centre and Carbon in the boundary (refer to diagram in Matsumoto's book on page 91).

https://remoteview.substack.com/p/matsumoto-collected-papers-1989-1999

Don't forget the obvious fusion of 2 x 27Al which is a more energetically favourable reaction than any given above.

https://www.nanosoft.co.nz/Fusion.php

E1 in ('Al') and E2 in ('Al' ) order by MeV desc

27Al + 27Al > 54Fe + 21.8426 MeV

Note, we see Fe + O spheres produced in the 'figure of 8' in ULTR (H2O + Al), We also see production of Carbon. Note in this experiment, there is no Mg, K or Cl.

We also see the same crenelated Fe + O microspheres form in NOVA microwave reactor.

In VEGA discharge reactor using brass plates (no Mg, K or Cl) and in discharges between two electrodes and in Hessdalen Ball Lightning impact. Many LENR researchers see production of Fe.

Bockris and Sundarasan produced Fe in Carbon arc discharge experiments in light water ONLY when there was dissolved Oxygen.

Sundaresan, R., & Bockris, J. O. (1994). Anomalous Reactions During Arcing Between Carbon Rods in Water. Fusion Technology, 26(3P1), 261–265. doi:10.13182/fst94-a30330

https://sci-hub.se/10.13182/FST94-A30330

2 x 12C + 2 x 18O > 56Fe + 4He

If you consider that the surface electron-nucleus macro cluster might cause the matter to form predominantly 4He from whatever goes in, then production of

- Alpha (4He)

- Tri Alpha (12C)

- Quad Alpha (16O)

is not so surprising. Then production of di-neutrons (Matsumoto, Steps to the Discovery of Electro-Nuclear Collapse, p.32) in the collapse of matter can easily lead to the production of 18O with the observed result of bockris.

Production of 2n

2H + 2e- + H > 2n + i2 + p ( reaction 29)

"elements also can be produced by the many-body fusion reactions of the hydrogens in the compressed hydrogen-clusters. For example, Equations (19) / (20) / (21) These elements are sequentially distributed from lithium to around iron." (Matsumoto, Steps to the Discovery of Electro-Nuclear Collapse, p.29-30)

I would suggest repeating the experiment with pure Aluminium as we do in ULTR to see if you still get the pits with the Fe in them. This way you can exclude reactions that consider Mg.

Expand full comment

It’s so good to see this posted, the 16 days spent at the hospital because of Covid prevented me to see it in a more timely manner, but I am so glad the work across teams is converging and that there is talk around the very useful Parkhomov’s tables. This is so encouraging!!!!

Expand full comment

Fascinating, Dr Clarage. I could use some pointers on an a related upcoming experiment, and I covet your input: mhc500a@aol.com

Expand full comment

It is my best guess that the missing mass and energy that occurs during the reaction is caused by quantum mechanical superposition because the energy and transmutation events happen in a coherent system,

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/91/Schrodingers_cat.svg/495px-Schrodingers_cat.svg.png

Schrödinger's cat: a cat, a flask of poison, and a radioactive source are placed in a sealed box. If an internal monitor (e.g. Geiger counter) detects radioactivity (i.e. a single atom decaying), the flask is shattered, releasing the poison, which kills the cat. The Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics implies that, after a while, the cat is simultaneously alive and dead. Yet, when one looks in the box, one sees the cat either alive or dead, not both alive and dead. This poses the question of when exactly quantum superposition ends and reality resolves into one possibility or the other.

When a process that produces energy and matter transformation occurs in a coherent system, the dynamical evolution of the process is not knowable until the system leaves the coherent state. The dynamical evolution of the process will include the energy that is produced and the matter that is converted to energy. Only the final disposition of the system is observable. In the case of the EVO, a small ball of transmuted matter remains after the EVO becomes incoherent. This speaks to a structure inside the EVO that statically stores matter and energy outside of all possible realities such as a singularity.

This production of a ball made of transmuted matter is seen as a reaction product throughout all forms of the Reaction. For example as unlikely as it seems, in SAFIRE, the experimenters found small balls of transmuted matter inside pits in the anode.

Expand full comment

Look for polarization in your experimentation. One of the essential characteristics of the Reaction is the development of superconductivity and coherence. This can be detected in experimentation by the appearance of polarization of the light and/or magnetism given off by the Reaction. Like the coherent light produced by a laser, the reaction will produce polarized emissions. This coherence indicates that the Reaction is coherent.

One of indications of coherence was seen in one of Bob Greenyer's experiments that produced bubbles of exploded matter. Around the bubble, a hexagonal pattern of polarized material (aluminum) showed up under irradiation from a polarized light source. The Reaction will produce intense polarized magnetic fields that will leave its coherent polarized impression around the exploding bubble.

In summary, there is a direct connection between the Reaction, superconductivity, and coherence that is a result of the Higgs mode and vacuum decay that are found in Condensed Matter Physics.

See

Amplitude / Higgs Modes in Condensed Matter Physics

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.2968

Expand full comment

Would be helpful to see the isotope distribution of the Fe produced!

Expand full comment

Why is it a ‘concern’ that you didn’t find Cr, Mn,Ti, Michael?

Expand full comment