Exploded Domes
Above is an elevation map of an Aluminum+Magnesium alloy that was subjected to 10kV electrolysis. The deionized water had K-Cl to carry the current.
These craters are very common on the electrodes. They are several micrometers across and also several micrometers deep.
A debris field is very common. Below is a wider field of view of such craters. Some are less than 1.0 micrometers.
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fdde3f74e-db26-4c9b-9154-fe73756ca78e_376x398.png)
Half the time the domes have not exploded. In the image above, in the lower right, you see a very bright spot. This is a dome, which I will come back to later.
The elemental analysis of the exploded domes is very consistent. Below is a common analysis of the bright spot at the bottom of the crater. Remember, the base alloy is Al-Mg; I have never seen any Fe while hunting around the electrode before electrolysis.
The other walls of the craters are just the base metal oxidized: Al+Mg+O
The debris field contains Carbon, see below. I consider these to be the dome that was exploded, and we are looking at the inside of the dome surface.
The un-exploded domes generally look like this:
Before and After Drawings
After analyzing several dozen of these, I have made the following: Before the changes wrought by the electricity, we have the Al-Mg alloy bounded by the H2O + K-Cl.
Afterwards we have a raised dome and a sunken crater. The Iron has formed at the bottom of the crater. The Carbon has formed inside the dome.
What are the likely nuclear rearrangements, and how much energy is produced?
Going to the Parkhomov tables at https://www.nanosoft.co.nz/
First look at just 27Al + 27Al → 54Fe + 22MeV
I estimate that the iron bottom to the crater, seen in Figures 1-4, is 3 cubic micrometers. Using the density of Iron 7,874 kg/m3, and Avogadro’s number with Iron’s atomic weight of 55.8 g/mole, I estimate there are 1.4 E13 Iron atoms in the 3 cubic micrometers at the bottom of the crater. At 22 MeV per atom formation, that comes to 48 Joules per crater.
we can put as inputs ['K', 'Cl', 'Mg', 'Al' ], and look at all exothermic outputs. Interesting that the first two re-arrangements are
Mg25 + Cl35 → He4 + Fe56 + 16MeV
Mg25 + Cl37 → He4 + Fe58 + 14.8MeV
What about the Carbon? There are several re-arrangements that produce Carbon
Mg25 + K41 → C12 + Fe54 + 6.5MeV
Al27 + K41 → C12 + Fe56 + 7.9MeV
My concern is that there are plenty of reactions that produce other metals: Cr, Mn, Ti. Why do I not see those? Much more to do. Stay tuned.
Hi Michael,
Thanks for sharing your experiment. Nice to see the craters and the Pretzel. Of course Fe in the centre and Carbon in the boundary (refer to diagram in Matsumoto's book on page 91).
https://remoteview.substack.com/p/matsumoto-collected-papers-1989-1999
Don't forget the obvious fusion of 2 x 27Al which is a more energetically favourable reaction than any given above.
https://www.nanosoft.co.nz/Fusion.php
E1 in ('Al') and E2 in ('Al' ) order by MeV desc
27Al + 27Al > 54Fe + 21.8426 MeV
Note, we see Fe + O spheres produced in the 'figure of 8' in ULTR (H2O + Al), We also see production of Carbon. Note in this experiment, there is no Mg, K or Cl.
We also see the same crenelated Fe + O microspheres form in NOVA microwave reactor.
In VEGA discharge reactor using brass plates (no Mg, K or Cl) and in discharges between two electrodes and in Hessdalen Ball Lightning impact. Many LENR researchers see production of Fe.
Bockris and Sundarasan produced Fe in Carbon arc discharge experiments in light water ONLY when there was dissolved Oxygen.
Sundaresan, R., & Bockris, J. O. (1994). Anomalous Reactions During Arcing Between Carbon Rods in Water. Fusion Technology, 26(3P1), 261–265. doi:10.13182/fst94-a30330
https://sci-hub.se/10.13182/FST94-A30330
2 x 12C + 2 x 18O > 56Fe + 4He
If you consider that the surface electron-nucleus macro cluster might cause the matter to form predominantly 4He from whatever goes in, then production of
- Alpha (4He)
- Tri Alpha (12C)
- Quad Alpha (16O)
is not so surprising. Then production of di-neutrons (Matsumoto, Steps to the Discovery of Electro-Nuclear Collapse, p.32) in the collapse of matter can easily lead to the production of 18O with the observed result of bockris.
Production of 2n
2H + 2e- + H > 2n + i2 + p ( reaction 29)
"elements also can be produced by the many-body fusion reactions of the hydrogens in the compressed hydrogen-clusters. For example, Equations (19) / (20) / (21) These elements are sequentially distributed from lithium to around iron." (Matsumoto, Steps to the Discovery of Electro-Nuclear Collapse, p.29-30)
I would suggest repeating the experiment with pure Aluminium as we do in ULTR to see if you still get the pits with the Fe in them. This way you can exclude reactions that consider Mg.
It’s so good to see this posted, the 16 days spent at the hospital because of Covid prevented me to see it in a more timely manner, but I am so glad the work across teams is converging and that there is talk around the very useful Parkhomov’s tables. This is so encouraging!!!!