Thank you very much for this. At about 11 minutes into your presentation there are some diagrams. It may interest you that the movement of the planets Mars and Jupiter describe eerily similar fractal patterns. In the geocentric universe, that is. A computer programmer wrote some code to demonstrate the movements of these planets, and if you click "path" to make the trail visible, and leave these algorithms running for a few minutes, the computer screen fills with amazing fractal flowers.
I linked to the pages with these applets in the footnotes of my recent Substack article, Psalms and Chemtrails.
Exactly, Michael. Wow, you've done a really thorough analysis. Thanks for pointing me to those articles. I was stupefied when I first came across this phenomenon. To me, these pattern refute the notion of a chaotic universe, but rather indicate that it is stable, and constant in size.
Karen, I have looked a couple of times at Russell's work. Though comprehensive in its intellectual scope, it does not resonate with me. Different tribes? :)
Please consider the field theory of Konstantin Meyl. Here it is the field that is the progenitor, the primal source of all movement, organisation and matter in the universe.
The shapes you are seeing in the cosmos (and indeed in biological systems) are formed by moving electromagnetic fields which tend, by the field laws to form all manner of vortex structures. A tidied up version of Maxwell's equations with an added 'propagation speed' is all that is required.
The field tends to spiral inwards and accumulate energy and when a certain intensity and scale is reached, stable vortices will form and these are interpreted as electrons. The field movement itself is responsible for the perceived electric charge, spin, magnetic dipole, solidity and mass i.e. gravitational pull.
Field vortices form a 'vortex radius' clearly visible in images of galaxies. Outside of the radius there is an inward spiral and within the radius 'solid-body' rotation, again visible in bar galaxies.
This solves many, if not all of the problems mentioned in Thunderbolt videos.
I have been following a parallel path but looking at how biological systems work and decided independently that a vortex-like bio-field is necessary to explain living systems. Discovering Thunderbolts videos is like seeing a biological system self-assemble in the cosmos. Eerie.
I started out reading about biology and because of my background was drawn towards the role of electromagnetism in living systems.
Nothing seemed to make much sense until reading Meyl whereupon everything fitted together automatically. I predict the same will happen with regards to the role of fields in space.
I have not thought about mathematics since leaving college so I am very rusty but reading Meyl was a true joy, a very welcome return to something fundamental and 'certain'.
You will have no trouble with Meyl I think. For practical purposes, the whole field theory can be reduced to a series of self-sustaining vortex patterns at the roots of reality with all other phenomena being emergent from such structures.
Thank you very much for this. At about 11 minutes into your presentation there are some diagrams. It may interest you that the movement of the planets Mars and Jupiter describe eerily similar fractal patterns. In the geocentric universe, that is. A computer programmer wrote some code to demonstrate the movements of these planets, and if you click "path" to make the trail visible, and leave these algorithms running for a few minutes, the computer screen fills with amazing fractal flowers.
I linked to the pages with these applets in the footnotes of my recent Substack article, Psalms and Chemtrails.
this is what I was looking for
https://mclarage.blogspot.com/2019/06/other-solar-systems-as-electrical_8.html
Are you talking like these patterns?
https://michaelclarage.substack.com/p/why-are-the-planets-spaced-just-so
Exactly, Michael. Wow, you've done a really thorough analysis. Thanks for pointing me to those articles. I was stupefied when I first came across this phenomenon. To me, these pattern refute the notion of a chaotic universe, but rather indicate that it is stable, and constant in size.
Michael you might want to look at Walter Russell's work and his idea of Light and the 9 lenses.
Karen, I have looked a couple of times at Russell's work. Though comprehensive in its intellectual scope, it does not resonate with me. Different tribes? :)
These are very interesting videos.
Please consider the field theory of Konstantin Meyl. Here it is the field that is the progenitor, the primal source of all movement, organisation and matter in the universe.
The shapes you are seeing in the cosmos (and indeed in biological systems) are formed by moving electromagnetic fields which tend, by the field laws to form all manner of vortex structures. A tidied up version of Maxwell's equations with an added 'propagation speed' is all that is required.
The field tends to spiral inwards and accumulate energy and when a certain intensity and scale is reached, stable vortices will form and these are interpreted as electrons. The field movement itself is responsible for the perceived electric charge, spin, magnetic dipole, solidity and mass i.e. gravitational pull.
Field vortices form a 'vortex radius' clearly visible in images of galaxies. Outside of the radius there is an inward spiral and within the radius 'solid-body' rotation, again visible in bar galaxies.
https://www.scribd.com/document/850973485/Potential-vortex-1st-Edition-Meyl-Konstantin-download
This solves many, if not all of the problems mentioned in Thunderbolt videos.
I have been following a parallel path but looking at how biological systems work and decided independently that a vortex-like bio-field is necessary to explain living systems. Discovering Thunderbolts videos is like seeing a biological system self-assemble in the cosmos. Eerie.
I do not believe that electric currents are produced from moving particles rather 'field currents' may move the 'charges': https://library-of-atlantis.com/2024/10/18/what-is-electricity/
The sun is nothing more nor less than the centre of a field vortex: https://library-of-atlantis.com/2024/10/13/what-is-the-sun/
A summary of my thoughts on electric field vortices in biology: https://library-of-atlantis.com/2025/04/03/the-nature-of-the-bio-field/
Konstantin Meyl's masterwork:
https://avalonlibrary.net/Nikola_Tesla/Books/Meyl%20-%20Scalar%20Waves%20(First%20Tesla%20Physics%20Textbook).pdf
thanks for the lead. A bit daunting.
Is this your writings?
https://library-of-atlantis.com/
My website, yes.
I started out reading about biology and because of my background was drawn towards the role of electromagnetism in living systems.
Nothing seemed to make much sense until reading Meyl whereupon everything fitted together automatically. I predict the same will happen with regards to the role of fields in space.
I have not thought about mathematics since leaving college so I am very rusty but reading Meyl was a true joy, a very welcome return to something fundamental and 'certain'.
You will have no trouble with Meyl I think. For practical purposes, the whole field theory can be reduced to a series of self-sustaining vortex patterns at the roots of reality with all other phenomena being emergent from such structures.
Wonderful Michael. Great job.