Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Wyse Harbor's avatar

Never let a little thing like tomorrow, stand in the way of today.

Tim Newton's avatar

This is a very insightful and engaging post. I liked it a lot.

I disagree, though with the point at the end about limiting God’s knowledge. I don’t think the quoted verse supports the argument.

After all, Adam was within earshot when God called because he immediately answered. This implies God was not ignorant of Adam’s physical location.

The context implies God chose this course of action to highlight the broken relationship. God was not playing hide-and-seek. By stopping and calling, God emphasized that something had changed about Adam.

Adam’s response shows he understood this. His response conveys fear and shame that did not exist before.

Adam had eaten of the tree of knowledge of good and EVIL. But God is only good. By asking Adam where he was, God called attention to the fact that Adam was now in a realm spiritually that is cut off from God and good, which comes only from God.

The randomness you spoke of flows from this incident—I agree with that. But to say God doesn’t know and fully understand that randomness is, in my opinion, going too far. It implies there are things in reality that God cannot control. Eventually that would lead to events over which God has no control. And that would mean that God really isn’t God.

If that were the case, then how could God judge evil? And where could we turn for protection from evil?

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?