"Astronomers just found a giant planet that shouldn’t exist..."

Science through press release

Yawn. Astronomers are surprised. Yaaaawwwwwnnnnn

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-025-02552-4

A very small star has been seen with a very large planet orbiting that star, and the two are very close. According to the tyrannical self-referential contemporary settled science, this is impossible because gravity cannot cause this. GRAVITY CANNOT CAUSE THIS. Until cosmology shifts to include electricity, I suppose we must sit through twisted hypotheses to explain this system that bring in dark matter, or random compressions from random gigantic explosions and collisions, or how about random fluctuations of the Higgs field…that might do it.

Solar system distance scales are always difficult to represent. This new system is very small compared to our solar system. The tiny star has 1/5th the radius of our Sun, and the planet discovered orbits so close that it would be only 1/10th of the distance to the planet Mercury of our system, and this tiny planet goes round its star once every 3 days! This hardly even qualifies as a “solar system” by standards of our own system. It reminds me of how the cells in your body are all more or less the same size when you compare them to bacteria. Bacteria are about 1/50th the size of human somatic cells. If you saw a bunch of cells that are 1/50th the size of all the ones you were familiar with, you might even conclude that this tiny cell is not a human cell at all, but is a very different species, with very different functions, that is living in harmony with what you call your cells. My point being that we need not to force these new tiny-systems into the same category of “solar system” that we apply to our system. These tiny systems might be entirely different creatures, with entirely different functions and life-cycles.

If these small systems cannot form due to the action of gravity, how might they form?Hannes Alfven, the Nobel Prize winner father of Plasma Cosmology, said that ‘gravitational systems are the “ashes” of prior electrical systems.’ In other words, electrical forces cause solar systems to form, and once they are formed, the system can hold together through gravity.

Fig. 1: Transit light curves and RV data for TOI-6894 b.

Fig 1 from the paper, showing raw data for identifying the plant

If you have electrical current flowing through a plasma, there are many structures that will form naturally, one of them looks like this,

These twisted current pairs collect matter, and concentrate the matter, they even bring heavy elements such as Iron into the very center of the rope, while lighter elements collect at the outer edges. That is, exactly what we see in cosmological masses. The electrical force is very well suited to forming such concentrations of matter. In other words, if you have an electrical cosmology you would PREDICT we would find all kinds of pairs of stars, star & planets, dare we even say proto-star-systems? We have to completely re-think our model for solar system formation. There is a lot of work to do here.

These plasma structures are in complete agreement with Maxwell’s equations. If you run this setup in a computer, you will see these structures arise. But the computer gives a very low resolution, granular result, because in Nature these systems are comprised of many trillions of particles, while computers can only handle thousands. This often happens in physics: there are observed facts that are in agreement with your theory, but it is extremely difficult to start with the theory and derive the known result. This is the physics version of Godel’s idea that every logical system will have true statements that cannot be derived from within the system.

Once a generation a brilliant scientist will propose a new model, or combine previously established models, to create a new field of study for the rest of us. The afore mentioned Hannes Alfven did just that, by combining the Maxwell’s equations with the equations for fluids, giving us Magneto-Hydro-Dynamics (MHD). That allowed previously intractable E&M problems in space to be solved using known ways of handling fluids. This opened up decades of further research. However, even the first generation after Alfven had forgotten Alfven’s own stern warning, that he had made some extreme simplifying assumptions, and no scientists should ever confuse his simplified model with what Nature is actually doing. For example, his simplified model removes the possibility of stationary electric fields in plasma structures, the most famous being the electrical double layer.

So vehement was ignorance and hubris of generations subsequent to Alfven, that if you proposed we might find these structures, say, around the Earth, you were called stupid and unfit for your post. Even after satellites went around the Earth and returned the data of these structures, there was still turf wars, with common statements along the line of, “but since we know there can be no electric fields in space…” GeoPhysicists now acknowledge these structure are everywhere, but of course there is zero apology for squashing the careers and reputations of all the scientists who first proposed the idea.

Well, ranting aside, I am only trying to point out that an electrical cosmology predicts that we will see all kinds of pairs of objects, which were formed through the action of electric currents in space, and now are held together as gravitational systems.